Playwright Turned Novelist Elena Hartwell | Author Interview

10:00 AM Ally M.G. 1 Comments



On April 1, 2018, Camel Press will release Three Strikes, You’re Dead by Elena Hartwell, the third book in the Eddie Shoes Mystery series, set inWashington State. Private investigator Eddie Shoes heads to a resort outside Leavenworth, Washington, for a mother-daughter getaway weekend. Eddie’s mother, Chava, wants to celebrate her new job at a casino by footing the bill for the two of them, and who is Eddie to say no?

On the first morning, Eddie goes on an easy solo hike, and a few hours later, stumbles upon a makeshift campsite and a gravely injured man. A forest fire breaks out and she struggles to save him before the flames overcome them both. The man hands her a valuable rosary and tells her his daughter is missing and begs for her help. He dies before he can tell her more information. Is Eddie now working for a dead man? Barely escaping the fire, Eddie wakes in the hospital to find both her parents have arrived on the scene. Will Eddie’s card-counting mother and mob-connected father help or hinder the investigation? The police search in vain for a body. How will Eddie find the missing girl with only Eddie’s memory of the man’s face and a photo of his daughter to go on? Says Hartwell, “In book three, I wanted to explore the other side of Eddie’s family history. Readers often ask about her father, Eduardo, so I decided to give him a little more time in the spotlight. This story also expands on my interest in the experiences of people who come to this country to build new lives, both legally and illegally. Of course, I couldn’t leave Chava out, so she's in there too. A triangle is always more interesting than a duo. I hope readers enjoy the twists in the plot and seeing the relationships evolve as much as I did.”

About The Author

Elena Hartwell’s​ writing career began in the theater, where she also worked as a director, designer, producer, and educator. Productions of her scripts have been performed around the U.S. and abroad. She lives in North Bend, Washington, with her husband. For more information go to www.elenahartwell.com.


Exclusive Author Q&A


Q - How did the idea of the third book come around? Did you know what you wanted to do since book one?


I decided I wanted Eddie and Chava to travel for the third book while I was finishing book two. Bellingham, Washington, statistically has one murder a year, and the books are only a couple months apart, so I didn’t want the bodies piling up like Cabot Cove on a busy weekend. 

Sending them on vacation felt like a good way to have them stumble over a body in a different jurisdiction. The events were a surprise, but I had known since the first book that I would continue exploring the relationships between Eddie, Chava, and Eduardo. It was a lot of fun to get to include Eddie’s friend Debbie Buse and, of course, Franklin, in the action, despite the fact it’s set out of town.

Q - Which character do you think is most like you?


This is tricky because Eddie and Chava are both a lot like me, but at different times in my life. The funny part to me is that Chava, who is the mom, is more like I was a younger person, and Eddie, despite being younger, is more like me now. I was a bit of a wild child as a teenager (stop laughing at the understatement, Mom), which is closer to Chava’s persona. 

I think all characters share aspects of a writer’s personality. Especially the characters who feel like real people. When a character feels flat to me, I often think that’s because the writer didn’t incorporate anything of themselves in the writing. This includes the “bad guys,” because even people who do bad things have complex internal landscapes. At minimum, it’s how we understand other people, which in some sense, is a reflection of us. For example, I would never kill another person … but if I did …

Q - What made you decide to start writing mysteries?


I worked as a playwright for a lot of years, but mystery was always the genre I read. Mysteries don’t work particularly well onstage. They make for great TV and movies, but it’s tricky to put convincing mysteries onstage unless it’s an old-fashioned, locked room murder. It can be done, but it wasn’t what I wrote for the stage. 

I also always knew I wanted to be a novelist. Because it’s the genre I read the most, it was what I wanted to write. I’m not sure why I didn’t start writing novels earlier in my career. I was so focused on the stage—I worked as a director, designer, and educator—it took up all my time. 

But, I think I had the belief in the back of my mind I wasn’t capable of writing an entire novel. I went to graduate school and wrote a dissertation for my PhD, which is book length, so I think that might have given me the proof I needed that I can write something of that magnitude. Then I worked in theater a few more years until I finally woke up one day and thought, if not now, when? I wrote a few early books, my fourth was published, and the rest, as they say, is history.

Q - What is the biggest difference between writing plays and novels?


Volume! A play is typically two hours of stage time. That’s in the neighborhood of 120 pages. And that’s not very many words on the page either. A novel, on the other hand, runs 65-85 thousand words, or 300, densely written pages. 

With a play, it’s all about dialogue. There are actions, of course, but the majority of the story is told through what people say. Novels include the internal state of the characters and descriptions of locations. With plays, the actor finds the internal state and shows it to the audience. In the theater, the set designer and the lighting designer and the sound designer create the phyiscal aspects based on the script. One of the hardest things for me to learn making the shift was how to write solid descriptions. 

I had an editor tell me once, years ago, “I’ve never seen this before. You write great atmosphere, but I don’t know what anything looks like.” That has stayed with me, so when I get compliments on descriptions of place in my novels, that’s especially meaningful to me.

Q - What has been your overall influence in telling Eddie’s story since book one?


This is a great question. I’m influenced by the era I grew up in. The 70s and 80s produced a generation like no other (I know, that’s true for every generation). But we were the last group that didn’t have computers. We could play outside without helicopter parents. We weren’t scheduled for every hour of the day. 

Our television detectives were low-key, without the speed and degree of violence we see today. James Rockford was just as likely to talk his way out of a situation than he was to go in somewhere with guns blazing. Sue Grafton’s Kinsey Millhone is still back in the years when I came of age. School shootings were unheard of. Meth and opioids weren’t an epidemic yet. 

Eddie is a bit of a throwback. She doesn’t love the latest and greatest gadget. She’s not someone who wants to spend her time on social media. She likes a simple life. Her mom, her dog, her friends, in person. 

To me, despite the fact I have to deal with 21st Century technology in the books, she’s an echo of simpler times. But she also deals with very current social issues, so she’s the culmination of the world I grew up in and the world I live in now.

Q - What is your go to music playlist and snacks when you’re getting in the zone to write?


I need quiet – so there’s no music, but oh the snacks, the snacks … so important! First off there’s coffee. I have my coffee—cream, no sugar—before anything else. Then there’s popcorn. I love to snack on popcorn. We don’t currently have a microwave (remember that Luddite thing I mentioned?) so I often get SkinnyPop or Smartfood (love the white cheddar!). I also like a little bit of chocolate. I lean toward dark chocolate, but this time of year I’m all about the Cadbury mini-eggs.

Q - What was the biggest challenge of writing a mother/daughter duo in a mystery novel.


This was actually pure joy for me. I love the dynamic between the two of them. I’m sure I’ve been influenced by the Golden Girls, short funny mom, tall, pragmatic daughter, but it’s also just a delight to put not one, but two strong women forward. My mom and I have a great relationship, so I have a wonderful model of the good parts of that dynamic. The arguments are all made up!

What is more of a challenge, albeit an interesting one, is that Eddie has a Latino father and a Jewish mother, so I have a lot of research to do.

First off, her mother Chava is currently investigating their Jewish heritage. So I get to do that right alongside her. I’ve learned about certain holidays and foods. It also forced me to really think about Chava’s family history. Her father survived the camps in Nazi Germany, and came to the US. Chava’s mother was Ashkenazi, her father Sephardic. All that background was fascinating for me. Eduardo’s backstory has not been revealed with as much depth, but I’ve got research going there too. Trying to get details right about different cultures is challenging because you want to honor them by getting them correct.

Q - What is your earliest memory of art?


A production of A Christmas Carol at a local theater when I was a kid. I’d been exposed to art a lot before that, museums, literature, dance, but that production stands out to me as the first time I was both wowed by an artistic experience and aware of how much it stayed with me. I had to be older to realize some of the other things I already loved, music, books, were art.

Q - A quote or statement you try to live by?


“Don’t confront me with my failures, I had not forgotten them” – It’s a line from the song “These Days” by Jackson Browne. What it means to me is two-fold. First, we all make mistakes in life, things that haunt us, that’s part of the human experience. Second, we don’t always have to jump on other people about their mistakes. We can take a step back and see if they are making a change in their life. It’s not our responsibility to “fix” people. We can help if asked, or call a person out on something if they are behaving badly, but we shouldn’t assume other people aren’t aware of their own faults or need us to remind them.

Q - If your book were to be picked up for TV or a film, who would you cast to be Eddie Shoes?


This is such a challenging question! She has the humor (and height) of Allison Janney, but she’s half Latina and in her thirties. It would be important to me that she was played by a person with Eddie’s ethnic background. Stephanie Beatriz might be great, but she’s only 5’7. They would have to cast someone really short to play Chava! I’m totally open to suggestions … Hollywood? Is that you calling?

Check out her books at www.elenahartwell.com

1 comments:

A Wrinkle in Time | Book vs Movie

2:40 PM Ally M.G. 0 Comments


Photo Credit: Disney Enterprise Inc.


I recently read A Wrinkle in Time because I was kinda hyped up for the movie. With it being a book turned movie, I wanted to see how the book to screen adaptation went....and quite frankly, I am impressed.

While the movie was not a perfect replica of the book, it came pretty damn close. There are only a some minor and one big change (that honestly wasn't that big of a deal). Before I go into detail, I want to warn the people who have not read or seen the movie -- the rest of this post will contain spoilers, so if you don't want the story to be ruined for you please read this after you have read or watched the movie!

The movie starts with a bit of a prologue where we are introduced to Mr. Murphy (Daddy Chris Pines), Meg ( Lyric Wilson ) and Mrs. Murphy ( Gugu Mbatha-Raw ), and we are introduced from the beginning that Mr. & Mrs. Murphy are big science wiz and are going to adopt a baby, Charles Wallace ( Deric McCabe ).

Then older Meg (Storm Reid) is introduce and the movie follows the book pretty well. Only minor change is that the twins, Sandy and Dennys, don't exist and Meg's bully has a name: Veronica (Rowan Blanchard). We are able to see Meg struggle at school and be teased because she is still not over her dad's disappearance.  Charles Wallace is also in school, and is too smart for his age just like in the book.

The only other small difference in the first half of the movie is that Mrs. Whatisit is introduced later by Charles Wallace rather than on the famous, "Dark and stormy night." Which is totally fine, as it still made the plot move forward.

The movie is true to character's personalities, especially the three kids. However, unlike the book, Meg, Charles Wallace and Calvin end up in Camozotz because of Meg's refusal to return to Earth without her dad. The Mrs' tesser is changed in course, and the kids are in Camozotz against their will. Unable to tesser them out the Mrs give just Meg their gifts and lets them go on the mission to rescue Mr. Murphy.

The movie added more to book in world building and the oddness of Camozotz. Also it was more dramatized which is fair since movies are different than books. Unlike the first half of the movie, which was very faithful to the book, in the second half we begin to see bigger changes.

For starters, we don't see the little boy bouncing the ball in the wrong rhythm (which is a minor thing sure). Meg, Charles Wallace and Calvin meet Mr. Red in a beach instead of the Central Intelligence straight away. So we don't see the forceful uniformity the center creates. At the beach Charles Wallace eats his sand sandwich and is quickly taken over by the IT...rather than fighting it and then letting himself get taken over due to his pride.

Once Charles Wallace becomes part of IT we are officially in the weird space of the Central Intelligence where he lets Meg find Mr. Murphy (rather than fighting her). Once Mr. Murphy is free, Charles Wallace starts taking them to The Brain. However, instead of meeting The Brain and having to unfollow the rhythm of the world...Calvin and Meg get taken over pretty quickly and Mr. Murphy tries to tesser Meg and Calvin away.

BUT, instead of tessering to the planet of Ixchel where Meg has to heal due to touching The Black Thing...Meg stays behind to save Charles Wallace. While this is kinda a big plot change, it did not hurt the film which is fair -- in Ixchel Meg learns how to save her brother and is sent back to be a warrior by the Mrs.

I understand that going to Ixchel would have just made the film longer and not all too necessary, because while in the room with The Brain -- Meg thinks of her faults and all the love in her, and figures out how to save Charles Wallace.

Rather than a screaming match like in the book, the movie gets a bit brutal and Charles Wallace uses the powers of IT to beat up his sister into giving in.

But obviously, Meg's love for Charles Wallace and his love to his sister beats the darkness and they are able to get away and bring Mr. Murphy home.

YAY HAPPINESS.

Overall, I am very pleased with the movie. The special effects and CGI were so beautiful too. I applaud the cast and crew of A Wrinkle in Time, and all the artists who worked on the film. Acting wise...I wasn't very impressed with Storm Reid, compared to her co-stars Levi Miller and Deric McCabe, who were fantastic for child actors. Reid had her good and bad scenes, but I see a lot of room for growth and improvement as an actor. (but what do I know haha)

If A Wrinkle in Time was part of your childhood I think you won't be disappointed with the movie adaptation. Go watch it!!

0 comments:

Sabriel by Garth Nix | Book Review

10:35 AM Ally M.G. 0 Comments



For many years Sabriel has lived outside the walls of the Old Kingdom, away from the random power of Free Magic, and away from the Dead who won't stay dead. But now her father, the Mage Abhorsen, is missing, and to find him Sabriel must cross back into that treacherous world - and face the power of her own extraordinary destiny.

Does the walker choose the path, or the path the walker?

--

Before receiving this book as a Christmas I was unaware this book even existed, and I am quite upset. Why doesn't this book have a big following like some other books? It deserves it, because it is marvelous.

"Yes," said Abhorsen. "I am a necromancer, but not of the common kind. where others of the art raise the dead, I lay them back to rest. And those that will not rest, I bind-or try to. I am Abhorsen . . ."

He looked at the baby again, and added, almost with a note of surprise, "Father of Sabriel."

When follow the story of Sabriel, an 18-year-old girl who lives in a world where magic and science combine, one night while at school she learns that her father is in danger so she leaves the comfort of her to go rescue her only family. She receives her father's magical items, a saber and a set of seven bells, which aid in keeping the Dead dead. Along the way she learns more about who her father was and it means to be the special necromancer called Abhorsen.

Sabriel through out the stories learns from her foolish mistakes, and does her best to not get her pride in the way when she has to make dire decisions where lives are at stake. It is a bit refreshing find a character who makes mistakes, is aware of their mistakes, admits their mistakes, and remembers the original mistake when a similar situation rises. Most characters, like most people do not admit their mistakes and while they may learn from it admitting one is wrong is not frequently seen or read.

Garth Nix writing is fast-paced, lush and hypnotic. He describes people, places and scenery poetically and thoroughly and he does not spend two pages doing in doing. We are given a complete picture with all the five senses and it only took a few paragraphs.

Nix's world building is interesting, for he sets the foundation of his Old Kingdom world without it being a massive information dump. The details seep through the narrative passively, because Sabriel has grown up in this land and nothing to her nothing is new, but we as readers everything is mysterious and we only learn bits and pieces along the way making the world actually feel like a magical unexplored world (leaving a number of things with no real explanations at times). The magic system in the Old Kingdom is unlike anything I have read before (and I read a lot of fantasy), Nix blend and mixes magic and science, not as enemies, but as equals. Science has strengths and weaknesses in the world just as magic has its own strengths and weaknesses. There was never a time where one was superior than the other, which was so strange and new.


“Let this be my final lesson. Everyone and everything has a time to die.”

My Rating: 5/5


0 comments: